AP High Court: We will monitor Satish Kumar's unnatural death case

• ABC MEDIUM
• ABC LARGE
• ABC EXTRA LARGE

Eenadu, Amaravati: Tirumala Srivari The High Court revealed that the CID's investigation into the unnatural death of AVSO (Assistant Vigilance Security Officer) Y. Satish Kumar, who had complained to the police about the gift theft incident in Parakamani, had come to light. In this context, it has been decided that they will monitor the case till the filing of the charge sheet. According to the reports filed by the ACB, it has been clarified that CV Ravikumar, who committed theft in Parakamani, falls under the definition of a government employee. Section 409 of the IPC (criminal breach of trust by a public servant) was deliberately not registered against him. According to the ACB report, it has been stated that Ravikumar and his family have assets beyond their income.

Tithide reiterated that the then officials and the police colluded with the accused Ravikumar and others to defeat the theft case. It has also objected that the officials and board members of Thithide did not follow the rules in receiving the properties given to the accused Ravikumar Thithide. The Supreme Court ordered the DGs of CID and ACB to 'proceed according to the provisions of the law' in these matters. It was made clear to the superiors and Titi that departmental action should be taken against those who violated the rules. Satisfied with the manner of investigation. Appreciated the concerned officials. 

• On the other hand, Thithide Evo expressed displeasure over the court's suggestion to stop inhumane checking of devotees who come voluntarily to count donations at Parakamani. The EO expressed its deep displeasure over the statement in the report that it is not possible to follow the court's instruction to set up tables for counting the gifts. It asked the EVO to come up with ideas to follow a civil procedure in the counting process. Giving some more time, the hearing was adjourned to 31st of this month. High Court Judge Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad gave an order to this effect on Thursday. 
• In the hearing held on Thursday, Srinivasababa, a lawyer for Evo, argued. It is not safe to roll a six-ton ​​hundi on a table. 300 devotees count the gifts in Parakamani every day. It is not possible to arrange tables for all of them. In order to make changes in the current policies in Tithide, the approval of the Agamashastra scholars and the members of the Tithide board is mandatory. Evo alone cannot decide. You (the court) know what kind of members are on the board. The EO will take steps to implement the suggestions made by the court in the permanent plan (Plan-B)'' he said. The judge reacted strongly to these arguments. Do you use tradition as an excuse to ignore court instructions? He commented bitterly. Is it traditional to walk around trampling down the gifts? They were angry. He said that the current procedure followed in the calculation is not correct.

Thursday, the bench heard the appeal filed by Ravikumar, the accused in the theft case in Parakamani, challenging the order given by the single judge directing the ACB to conduct an investigation into his assets along with the CID investigation. It is said that there is something in this affair. It reminded that the case was an attempt to settle the whole matter by surrendering Rs.15 crore assets to Titi. It has been clarified that interim orders cannot be given in Ravikumar's case at present. The hearing was adjourned to 29th of this month. A bench consisting of Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice R. Raghunandan Rao gave an order to this effect on Thursday.

It is known that the bench is conducting a hearing on the Sumoto lawsuit filed on the issue of determining the legality of the order issued by the Lok Adalat compromising the theft case along with Ravikumar's appeal. C. Nageswara Rao, the senior advocate for Ravikumar in the hearing held on Thursday, said that the single judge has issued orders to conduct an investigation and register a case. Requested to refrain from taking hasty action against Ravikumar. They want to stay the orders of the single judge. This is petty theft Kesani said.